case law explanation Things To Know Before You Buy
case law explanation Things To Know Before You Buy
Blog Article
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy with the information contained on this site, or perhaps the information linked to over the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can generate inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The loads of this power casts an obligation over the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested to get a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Read more
What's more, it addresses the limitation period under Article ninety one and a hundred and twenty with the Limitation Act, focusing on when plaintiff to seek cancellation. The importance of deciding application under Order VII Rule eleven CPC based solely on plaint averments in highlighted, excluding extrinsic material at this stage. Read more
The a good amount of this power casts an obligation about the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it can be made very clear that police is free to just take action against any person who's indulged in criminal activities issue to regulation. eight. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two months, address the alleged police misconduct. When the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, they usually shall be assigned non-industry duties while in the interim period. Read more
2299 of 2025. The findings are pending finalization and will be submitted without delay. In addition they stated that directives for strict compliance have been issued to all Karachi units, with non-compliance experiencing departmental action. Furthermore, they submitted that an existing enquiry is underway. Therefore, They can be directed to complete the proceedings and submit the enquiry report to this court through MIT-II of this Court. twelve. This petition stands disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more
Lots of the volumes (including more recent volumes than the library's holdings) also are accessible online through the Caselaw Access Project.
In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a 12-year previous boy from his home to protect him from the Awful physical and sexual abuse he experienced suffered in his home, also to prevent him from abusing other children in the home. The boy was placed within an crisis foster home, and was later shifted about within the foster care system.
eleven . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is often a free and democratic country, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; When the parents on the boy or Lady never approve of such inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they're able to do if they might Lower off social relations with the son or the daughter, Nonetheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these types of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl that's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or person that's a major, the few is neither harassed by everyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who offers this sort of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to undertaking by instituting criminal proceedings because of the police against such persons and further stern action is taken against these types of person(s) as provided by law.
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming on the main case, Additionally it is a effectively-established proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is matter on the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings over the evidence.
12. There is not any denial from the fact that in Government service it is anticipated that the persons click here getting their character higher than board, free from any moral stigma, are to get inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is often a condition precedent for appointment into a Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above is that the only impediment to being appointed to the Government service would be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a way out or guise to try and do away with the candidature with the petitioner. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 185 Order Date: 15-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative with the regulation laid down through the Supreme Court while in the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. Thus, the competent authority with the parent department of the petitioner as well as Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount with the petitioner and pay the pension amount and other ancillary benefits towards the petitioner to which he is entitled under the law within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority from the respondent can be directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits on the petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more
The reason for this difference is that these civil legislation jurisdictions adhere to your tradition that the reader should be capable to deduce the logic from the decision and also the statutes.[4]
In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials acting within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case regulation previously rendered on similar cases.
Therefore, this petition is found being not maintainable and is dismissed along with the pending application(s), plus the petitioners may well request remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more